I think it is in the cut where there’s more poetry. I love that gesture.
Yes, it is somewhere between Enzo Mari, who would probably have treated it more roughly, and Andrea Branzi, where there’s this vegetal organic aspect.
There’s something to do with your drawings. It’s like a line…
In my drawings and my objects in general, the main characteristic is the way the objects are joined. When I draw, it’s the same thing. My teachers always said that it was not the right way of drawing because, when you draw a landscape, you usually position certain points to start and then continue with details. I am totally the bad one who started to draw a tree first, and then another one…and then built the drawing around that. The same is true for an object. My professor said I was a very bad design student because if I had a wardrobe to design, I’d spend three weeks designing the door handle. (Laughs). Well, in the case of Baton, the handle was the starting point for the collection. (more laughs).
That’s amazing. To see a starting point that is almost maniacal to see in simple detail and joints. But then again, it can work and be the language for the whole family. Even the Baton family has become quite large. Do you see it growing more?
Yes, because you have to consider that this construction is the starting point for holding something, and there are various subjects in a domestic landscape or office. I think it’s important to keep this delicateness and mobility.
We hope to do it well. You just made me think again that it’s a good collection for BD because historically, the brand has always been about the tension between very pure industrial design and very bizarre, over-the-top bold pieces where function is not principal, but what is important is the personality.
I think this collection has a lot of personality. There’s still function, but in the way I’d like to envision the company going forward, where there’s poetry that joins both things. It’s a bold object made simple, and it can be very silent and still have character.
It was interesting to see yesterday the two pieces at the Center George Pompidou show that just opened. The point of this exhibition was to show my version of different types of subjects, from drawing to textile, from ceramic to colour, from industry to craft, and from a limited number of pieces to a million pieces. I thought I was getting totally lost and unable to see my point of view, but the last two years have helped me feel free to mix all of these aspects. I think all objects have their own quality linked to their context.
They blend together without one being louder or more important than the other. It's about how you arranged the room. The show feels excellent and balanced. And I think that’s how you work.
I thought it was a detriment before. Rolf Felbaum told me once: your principal problem is that you are good at many things, which could be a problem because you can not concentrate on one thing. But I don’t think that’s true. It’s good to give a chance to different possibilities in different fields.